Skip to content

autism

Neurotypical Spectrum Disorder (NTSD)

Proposed diagnostic construct. Not recognized by any legitimate diagnostic body, though widely reinforced by social institutions.

Diagnostic Criteria

A. Persistent pattern of cognitive, emotional, and social functioning characterized by a strong preference for normative coherence, rapid closure of uncertainty, and limited tolerance for sustained depth—intellectual, experiential, or emotional—beginning in early socialization and present across multiple contexts (e.g. interpersonal relationships, workplace environments, family systems, cultural participation).

B. The pattern manifests through three (or more) of the following symptoms:

  1. Normative Rigidity
    Marked discomfort when encountering deviations from customary practices, beliefs, or emotional expressions, even when such deviations are demonstratively non-harmful or adaptive. Often expressed as “But why?” followed by silence rather than curiosity.
  2. Contextual Literalism
    Difficulty interpreting meaning, identity, or emotional communication outside their most common cultural framing; metaphor and subtext are tolerated primarily when socially standardized.
  3. Consensus-Seeking Reflex
    Habitual alignment with majority opinion, authority, or prevailing emotional norms when forming judgments, often prior to personal reflection or affective attunement.
  4. Change Aversion with Rationalization
    Resistance to novel ideas or emotional complexity, accompanied by post-hoc justifications framed as realism, pragmatism, or emotional maturity, rather than acknowledged emotional discomfort.
  5. Social Script Dependence
    Reliance on rehearsed conversational and emotional scripts (weather, productivity, polite outrage), and visible distress when interactions require unscripted vulnerability, prolonged emotional presence, or exploratory dialogue.
  6. Hierarchy Calibration Preoccupation
    Excessive attention to formal roles, relational labels, and status markers, such as job titles, relationship escalators, age-based authority, or institutional validation, with difficulty engaging others outside these frameworks as emotionally or epistemically equal.
  7. Ambiguity Intolerance
    A pronounced need to resolve uncertainty quickly—cognitively and emotionally, even at the cost of nuance. Mixed feelings, ambivalence, or unresolved emotional states may be experienced as distressing or unproductive. Questions with multiple valid answers may be experienced as irritating rather than interesting.
  8. Pathologizing the Outlier
    Tendency to interpret uncommon preferences, communication styles, atypical cognitive styles, emotional expressions, relational structures, or life choices as problems needing explanation, containment, or optimization.
  9. Empathy via Projection
    Assumption that others experience emotions in similar ways and intensities, leading to misattuned reassurance, premature advice, or minimization of divergent affective experiences, resulting in advice that begins with “If it were me…” and ends with confusion when it is, in fact, not them.
  10. Depth Avoidance in Sustained Inquiry
    Marked difficulty engaging in prolonged, high-resolution discussion of topics that extend beyond surface facts, sanctioned opinions, or immediately actionable conclusions. Deep exploration of systems, first principles, or existential implications is often curtailed.
  11. Diffuse Interest Profile
    A pattern of broad but shallow interests, with engagement driven primarily by social relevance or utility rather than intrinsic fascination. Mastery is rare; familiarity is common.
  12. Expertise Anxiety
    Discomfort in the presence of deep intellectual or emotional proficiency—either in oneself or others—leading to minimization, deflection, or reframing depth as excessive, obsessive, or impractical.
  13. Instrumental Curiosity
    Curiosity activated mainly when a topic yields immediate benefit. Curiosity pursued for its own sake may be regarded as indulgent, inefficient, or emotionally suspect.
  14. Affective Flattening in Non-Crisis Contexts
    A restricted range or shallowness of emotional experience outside socially sanctioned peaks (e.g. celebrations, emergencies). Subtle, slow-building, or internally complex emotional states may be under-recognized, quickly translated into simpler labels, or bypassed through distraction.
  15. Emotional Resolution Urgency
    A strong drive to “process,” “move on,” or “feel better” rapidly, often resulting in premature emotional closure. Emotional depth is equated with rumination rather than information.
  16. Vulnerability Time-Limiting
    Tolerance for emotional exposure is constrained by implicit time or intensity limits. Extended emotional presence—grief without deadlines, joy without justification, love without clear structure—may provoke discomfort or withdrawal.

C. Symptoms cause clinically significant impairment in adaptive curiosity, cross-cultural understanding, deep relational intimacy, sustained emotional attunement, and the capacity to remain present with complex internal states—both one’s own and others’, or collaboration with neurodivergent individuals, particularly in rapidly changing environments or in relationships requiring long-term emotional nuance.

D. The presentation is not better explained by acute stress, lack of exposure, trauma-related emotional numbing, cultural display rules alone, or temporary social conformity for situational survival (e.g. customer service roles, family holidays).


Specifiers

  • With Strong Institutional Reinforcement (e.g. corporate culture, rigid schooling)
  • With Moral Certainty Features
  • Masked Presentation (appears emotionally open but only within safe, scripted bounds)
  • Late-Onset (often following promotion to middle management)

Course and Prognosis

NTSD is typically stable across adulthood. Improvement correlates with sustained exposure to emotional complexity without forced resolution, relationships that reward presence over performance, and practices that cultivate interoceptive awareness rather than emotional efficiency. Partial remission has been observed following prolonged engagement with artists, immigrants, queer communities, altered states, long-form grief, open-source software, or toddlers asking “why” without stopping.


Differential Diagnosis

Must be distinguished from:

  • Willful ignorance (which involves effort)
  • Malice (which involves intent)
  • Burnout (which improves with rest)
  • Actual lack of information (which improves with learning)

NTSD persists despite information.

In Defense of the Em Dash — A Beautiful Line of Thought ✍️

Lately, I’ve noticed something strange happening in online discussions: the humble em dash (—) is getting side-eyed as a telltale sign that a text was written with a so-called “AI.” I prefer the more accurate term: LLM (Large Language Model), because “artificial intelligence” is a bit of a stretch — we’re really just dealing with very complicated statistics 🤖📊.

Now, I get it — people are on high alert, trying to spot generated content. But I’d like to take a moment to defend this elegant punctuation mark, because I use it often — and deliberately. Not because a machine told me to, but because it helps me think 🧠.

A Typographic Tool, Not a Trend 🖋️

The em dash has been around for a long time — longer than most people realize. The oldest printed examples I’ve found are in early 17th-century editions of Shakespeare’s plays, published by the printer Okes in the 1620s. That’s not just a random dash on a page — that’s four hundred years of literary service 📜. If Shakespeare’s typesetters were using em dashes before indoor plumbing was common, I think it’s safe to say they’re not a 21st-century LLM quirk.

The Tragedy of Othello, the Moor of Venice, with long dashes (typeset here with 3 dashes)

A Dash for Thoughts 💭

In Dutch, the em dash is called a gedachtestreepje — literally, a thought dash. And honestly? I think that’s beautiful. It captures exactly what the em dash does: it opens a little mental window in your sentence. It lets you slip in a side note, a clarification, an emotion, or even a complete detour — just like a sudden thought that needs to be spoken before it disappears. For someone like me, who often thinks in tangents, it’s the perfect punctuation.

Why I Use the Em Dash (And Other Punctuation Marks)

I’m autistic, and that means a few things for how I write. I tend to overshare and infodump — not to dominate the conversation, but to make sure everything is clear. I don’t like ambiguity. I don’t want anyone to walk away confused. So I reach for whatever punctuation tools help me shape my thoughts as precisely as possible:

  • Colons help me present information in a tidy list — like this one.
  • Brackets let me add little clarifications (without disrupting the main sentence).
  • And em dashes — ah, the em dash — they let me open a window mid-sentence to give you extra context, a bit of tone, or a change in pace.

They’re not random. They’re intentional. They reflect how my brain works — and how I try to bridge the gap between thoughts and words 🌉.

It’s Not Just a Line — It’s a Rhythm 🎵

There’s also something typographically beautiful about the em dash. It’s not a hyphen (-), and it’s not a middling en dash (–). It’s long and confident. It creates space for your eyes and your thoughts. Used well, it gives writing a rhythm that mimics natural speech, especially the kind of speech where someone is passionate about a topic and wants to take you on a detour — just for a moment — before coming back to the main road 🛤️.

I’m that someone.

Don’t Let the Bots Scare You

Yes, LLMs tend to use em dashes. So do thoughtful human beings. Let’s not throw centuries of stylistic nuance out the window because a few bots learned how to mimic good writing. Instead of scanning for suspicious punctuation, maybe we should pay more attention to what’s being said — and how intentionally 💬.

So if you see an em dash in my writing, don’t assume it came from a machine. It came from me — my mind, my style, my history with language. And I’m not going to stop using it just because an algorithm picked up the habit 💛.

📰 Featured by Sibelga and Passwerk: When Being Different Becomes a Strength

I am excited to share some wonderful news—Sibelga and Passwerk have recently published a testimonial about my work, and it has been shared across LinkedIn, Sibelga’s website, and even on YouTube!


What Is This All About?

Passwerk is an organisation that matches talented individuals on the autism spectrum with roles in IT and software testing, creating opportunities based on strengths and precision. I have been working with them as a consultant, currently placed at Sibelga, Brussels’ electricity and gas distribution network operator.

The article and video highlight how being “different” does not have to be a limitation—in fact, it can be a real asset in the right context. It means a lot to me to be seen and appreciated for who I am and the quality of my work.


Why This Matters

For many neurodivergent people, the professional world can be full of challenges that go beyond the work itself. Finding the right environment—one that values accuracy, focus, and dedication—can be transformative.

I am proud to be part of a story that shows what is possible when companies look beyond stereotypes and embrace neurodiversity as a strength.


Thank you to Sibelga, Passwerk, and everyone who contributed to this recognition. It is an honour to be featured, and I hope this story inspires more organisations to open up to diverse talents.

👉 Want to know more? Check out the article or watch the video!